🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear the manager was able to withstand losing against Grimsby. Survive an important European final against a particularly poor Tottenham teams in living memory. He could survive home defeats to West Ham and Wolves, a lowly league position, the tactical inflexibility, undermining the team's best homegrown talent, the 32% win rate, calling the squad the worst the club has ever seen. Yet, there existed a single opponent with whom Ruben Amorim would not be allowed to engage. If you challenge Jason Wilcox, you had better succeed.

Regrettably, like many a Premiership defender during Blackburn Rovers' championship campaign, the coach came at the executive and appears to have missed. The most casual observer can see the paradoxical situation: a manager who frequently berated at his players for failing in individual battles crumbling in the face of the intense pressure and animal charisma of a the Premier League’s most feared football executives.

And frankly, this whole painful saga seems to paint Jason Wilcox in a different perspective. It may have been tempting, based on his brief stint of experience at Southampton, to view Jason Wilcox as merely a functionary in the United exoskeleton: an individual whose appointment was due as much to his friendship with his former boss Omar Berrada as any verifiable talent. How wrong we all were. By masterfully outmanoeuvring United’s feted head coach, as he outmanoeuvred the unfortunate Dan Ashworth before him, Jason Wilcox has proved himself as one of the sport’s strategic masterminds: a strategic mind of which United’s mid-table rivals will now be justifiably concerned.

The Strategic Clash Regarding Formation & Ideology

For example, this was the director , after being involved in the leadership that appointed the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim originally, was instrumental in trying to persuade him to ditch his beloved 3-4-3. Naturally, these pleas were resisted. But perhaps such directives carry more weight when issued from the mouth of a man the impeccable football pedigree he possesses, holder of international appearances and a role in a title-winning side decades past.

Perhaps in time Jason Wilcox may be persuaded to explain his reasoning publicly. Maybe one day questions may arise why Amorim is departing with a full payout, with no penalty clause in place. But Jason Wilcox seldom speaks in public, for excellent reasons. The true intellectuals in football – individuals such as Jason Wilcox – simply operate at a level beyond our own mundane comprehension. Were he to speak, probably we would perceive would be ultrasonic blips and four-dimensional whirring. Desiring an explanation is not the same as being ready to receive.

The Supreme Power In the Throne

Naturally, in training our focus on Jason Wilcox we overlook the true genius behind the club's current leadership. Jason Wilcox is, after all, merely executing the directives of his ultimate superior Sir Jim Ratcliffe, who in private has emphasized his desire for a four-man defense. According to reports, Ratcliffe has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for the club to embrace analytics and analytics. Per reports, during a leadership summit soon after his minority ownership, he declared that United’s style to football “shall be determined in this room”.

After all, Ratcliffe is a specialist in this technical football matters, drawing from his background in petrochemicals and sailing. Most importantly he remains incredibly rich, and it is known, the rich are superior: more insightful, more wise, strategically brilliant, simply superior. Whom else would you trust to manage an enlightened programme of cost-cutting, the construction of a new stadium that looks a lot like an abstract design, the signing of Benjamin Sesko?

The New Soccer Hierarchy: Directors Over Managers

This represents a shift we are increasingly seeing at the elite levels football. Historically, clubs foolishly entrusted big footballing decisions to subordinate staff like managers, talent spotters – players themselves. Perhaps it was once feasible for a young, visionary coach with a philosophy and drive to join a club and see their vision through to completion. Yet how many companies have these guys set up? How many large-scale layoffs have they managed? Better by far to place the real power where it belongs: the leadership tier, the casually dressed executives, the individuals with impressive LinkedIn profiles. It is wiser to determine the strategy by the directors and hire a coach who can tailor their offering to suit. If managers were once chefs, they have become more like delivery personnel: not responsible for the product, but still finally accountable if it arrives poorly or fails to meet standards.

Nowadays, a coach's role is increasingly not about defining the vision and more about selling it: the front-facing representative on the front desk, the visible figurehead for a club they have minimal power to influence. Enzo Maresca takes a squad of literal children into Europe and secures domestic cups, and essentially gets sacked for talking. A manager at Celtic sees his standing damaged whereas the people who appointed him continue to make errors another day.

A Modern Corporate Game: Responsibility Only for the Few

And possibly in a small way this represents neoliberalism at work: the elevation of a gilded overclass who are infallible, whose decisions remain untouchable, whose errors can invariably be resolved by sacking without explanation. Appoint the system coach only to fire them for using too much 3-4-3. Bring in the project manager and later discard them for taking too long. And above all be grateful; for the incremental season ticket price rises, for your new summer signings, for the fact that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – remain in control.